Eating. Why?
Eating is bizarre.
Earlier today I couldn't take my eyes off a guy with a Baskin Robbins sundae sitting across from me on the bus. Over and over I watched him cut his pink plastic spoon through the whipped cream into the stubborn hard-pack chocolate ice cream below, hack out a small nugget (testing the limits of the flimsy spoon) and carry it to his mouth. He'd close his lips around the spoon, pull it out and start again. Maybe the next time a tendril of strawberry would hang over the edge of the spoon, and he'd have to open wider or give it a bit more action with the tongue. As the sundae melted, the whole process got messier. But he attacked that sundae with determination and rhythm, pausing for breath and to check the street signs — rarely, because he was transfixed by the ice cream.
Here was a grown, fit man, eating a sundae. Totally ordinary. But, briefly, utterly captivating. It wasn't sexy or funny like food can sometimes be. It was just a guy eating ice cream. But it struck me how silly the whole thing was — this process of carrying food to our stomachs — junk food especially — only to have it passed through, digested and dropped back out again hours later. The whole fact of eating seemed to me in that moment to be just a weird waste of time.
Why chew? Why break it up into small pieces? Why put it in a cup or bowl? On a plate? With matching utensils and napkins? Why cook and prepare it? Why transport it great distances? I wonder why we don't simply take the raw ingredients and put them directly into our bodies. Why this activity called eating?
I guess, it's because we absolutely need to fill our minutes with sensation.
People so often invest so much attention in what they are eating. How often have I watched someone stare at a bagel with cream cheese, lift it to her wide-open mouth, clamp down, smear her cheeks with goo, chew madly while wiping her face, then stare at the bagel again? Or blow across the rim of a polystyrene cup, gazing into space as the waves of coffee lap the far edge? What are we looking at?
Maybe we're watching the steam rise. Maybe we're looking at the shapes our teeth make or the layers of colors in a sandwich. Maybe we're looking at the ice cream melt against the spoon or the saliva freeze to the stainless steel. Maybe we're watching the butter glisten in a bowl of peas or the oil dribble from a slice of pizza. Maybe we're looking at the holes in the bread or wondering about what grows from a sesame seed.
Who knows. But whatever we're doing, it seems to me to be an extremely introverted and self-indulgent practice.
Eating is a function of the body no more glamorous than sleeping, crying, sweating, farting, burping, bleeding. Truth be told, chewing is only a few steps away from shitting.
There's a scene in My So-Called Life, in which Angela says in one of her voice-over monologues, "I cannot bring myself to eat a well-balanced meal in front of my mother. It just means too much to her. I mean, if you start to think about, like, chewing, what it really is, how people just do it, like, in public."
She seems not to complete the thought, but even then I knew exactly what she meant.
And she's right: We — sensible, boring people, that is — don't have sex in public. We don't pee in public. Eating is kind of gross. It's kind of personal. What in the world are we doing with a sundae on a bus?

4 Comments:
Food is an utterly pleasurable experience for me. When I look or think about a bowl of ice cream, for instance, it's like an addict looking at his next fix. Well, I am a food addict, I have admitted and talked about this before on other occasions.
As for sex in public, speak for yourself! heh heh
I've read about those people — health nuts, sports dieters and the like — who think of food as nothing more than fuel. They don't care about taste or experience; all they are doing is feeding cells. This is an empty way to live. I once had a nectarine from a fruit stand in Nice, France, that I will continue to rave about until I die. It was bar none the best thing I have ever eaten in my life. (This may have something to do with its contrast to the packets of little orange cheese-and-peanut-butter crackers I had been subsisting on because I was running out of money, but I know it was a damn good piece of fruit on its own.) To deny oneself these pleasures is to deny oneself all the good of living.
I completely agree that eating is nothing if not sensual. I am obsessed with food. When I have breakfast, I think about what I'm going to have for lunch.
Art is an appeal to the senses to produce an emotional effect. A painting appeals to the eyes. Music appeals to the ears. Food appeals to the nose and tongue. A Big Mac is not art, just as Project Runway is not art, but experiencing food can — and should — be as fulfilling as reading a good book or visiting MoMa. For some reason yesterday, however, it all struck me as incredibly silly.
AGreed.
Food and the act of eating. It brings me incredible pleasure, but sometimes I'm very put off by it. I just don't to have to eat. This morning I tossed half my croissant because it was buttery and flakey and my fingers were getting greasy and it just grossed me out and making a mess on my desk.
You are a great writer.
I really enjoy eating with friends and family, but I don't like to have anyone see me eating alone, it's too personal and private. Like when I'm having lunch at my desk and someone comes in, I feel like I've been caught masturbating. I have friends who eat simply to refuel, but I do not share that utilitarian impulse. I hate spending money on bad food; I'd rather spend a little more to eat something really satisfying. And I agree, you are a very engaging writer.
Post a Comment
<< Home